)]}'
{
  "commit": "e6f43a41ba6206b691c8e9a301f0b4528b8f2278",
  "tree": "5239f9593b08e2bba67a9608906090ee86b5d5a9",
  "parents": [
    "ebfc2be12ec599e3504ad2c1eaa9fc5892c94c9d"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Russell King (Oracle)",
    "email": "rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk",
    "time": "Mon Feb 23 09:34:20 2026 +0000"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Jakub Kicinski",
    "email": "kuba@kernel.org",
    "time": "Tue Feb 24 17:43:22 2026 -0800"
  },
  "message": "net: stmmac: qcom-ethqos: remove register field value obfuscations\n\nConvert the register field values to something more human readable.\n\nFor example, using (BIT(29) | BIT(27)) to update a register field that\nconsists of bits 29:27 is an obfuscated way of writing decimal 5 for\nthis field. The comment above needs to explain that this value is 5.\n\nWorse still is BIT(12) | GENMASK(9, 8), which is used to hide the\ndecimal value 19 for the bitfield 16:8.\n\nFix these, and a few others by using FIELD_PREP(). While it means we\nhave bare numeric constants, this is more preferable than having the\nobfuscation.\n\nReviewed-by: Mohd Ayaan Anwar \u003cmohd.anwar@oss.qualcomm.com\u003e\nTested-by: Mohd Ayaan Anwar \u003cmohd.anwar@oss.qualcomm.com\u003e\nSigned-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) \u003crmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk\u003e\nLink: https://patch.msgid.link/E1vuSKa-0000000ASbo-2zQg@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk\nSigned-off-by: Jakub Kicinski \u003ckuba@kernel.org\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "690bd5c7e1a64fdd41e30e3b59447e9f2853718f",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c",
      "new_id": "50b95fd19f9d69e706eddca5f863105f147e4cd9",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-qcom-ethqos.c"
    }
  ]
}