)]}'
{
  "commit": "e82ff9b6cb767fc823d5e461034f32388c4092a2",
  "tree": "d2083c8c4af4412160f17ecf5cf2281a0d53a3e8",
  "parents": [
    "e252ed8988578f01da5a4f5aa4c2269f96f03951",
    "14a51045e10d3087b8374deef02a9d3a694132d6"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Al Viro",
    "email": "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk",
    "time": "Wed Apr 08 03:17:38 2026 -0400"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Al Viro",
    "email": "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk",
    "time": "Wed Apr 08 03:17:38 2026 -0400"
  },
  "message": "Merge branches \u0027work.coda\u0027 and \u0027work.dcache-busy-wait\u0027 into for-next\n\n-next: trivial conflict in Documentation/filesystems/porting.rst (several\nbranches append to the end of that file, order of entries is irrelevant)\n\n-next: hopefully no cifs conflict anymore, but if they still use the\nvariant with -\u003ed_u.d_alias in cifs_d_mark_tmpfile(), just replace the\nline in question with\n\tBUG_ON(d_really_is_positive(dentry));\nas in fs/dcache.c:d_mark_tmpfile().\n",
  "tree_diff": []
}
