get rid of busy-waiting in shrink_dcache_tree()

If shrink_dcache_tree() runs into a potential victim that is already
dying, it must wait for that dentry to go away.  To avoid busy-waiting
we need some object to wait on and a way for dentry_unlist() to see that
we need to be notified.

The obvious place for the object to wait on would be on our stack frame.
We will store a pointer to that object (struct completion_list) in victim
dentry; if there's more than one thread wanting to wait for the same
dentry to finish dying, we'll have their instances linked into a list,
with reference in dentry pointing to the head of that list.

* new object - struct completion_list.  A pair of struct completion and
pointer to the next instance.  That's what shrink_dcache_tree() will wait
on if needed.

* add a new member (->waiters, opaque pointer to struct completion_list)
to struct dentry.  It is defined for negative live dentries that are
not in-lookup ones and it will remain NULL for almost all of them.

It does not conflict with ->d_rcu (defined for killed dentries), ->d_alias
(defined for positive dentries, all live) or ->d_in_lookup_hash (defined
for in-lookup dentries, all live negative).  That allows to colocate
all four members.

* make sure that all places where dentry enters the state where ->waiters
is defined (live, negative, not-in-lookup) initialize ->waiters to NULL.

* if select_collect2() runs into a dentry that is already dying, have
its caller insert a local instance of struct completion_list into the
head of the list hanging off dentry->waiters and wait for completion.

* if dentry_unlist() sees non-NULL ->waiters, have it carefully walk
through the completion_list instances in that list, calling complete()
for each.

For now struct completion_list is local to fs/dcache.c; it's obviously
dentry-agnostic, and it can be trivially lifted into linux/completion.h
if somebody finds a reason to do so...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>