| ============= | |
| Atomic bitops | |
| ============= | |
| While our bitmap_{}() functions are non-atomic, we have a number of operations | |
| operating on single bits in a bitmap that are atomic. | |
| API | |
| --- | |
| The single bit operations are: | |
| Non-RMW ops: | |
| test_bit() | |
| RMW atomic operations without return value: | |
| {set,clear,change}_bit() | |
| clear_bit_unlock() | |
| RMW atomic operations with return value: | |
| test_and_{set,clear,change}_bit() | |
| test_and_set_bit_lock() | |
| Barriers: | |
| smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic() | |
| All RMW atomic operations have a '__' prefixed variant which is non-atomic. | |
| SEMANTICS | |
| --------- | |
| Non-atomic ops: | |
| In particular __clear_bit_unlock() suffers the same issue as atomic_set(), | |
| which is why the generic version maps to clear_bit_unlock(), see atomic_t.txt. | |
| RMW ops: | |
| The test_and_{}_bit() operations return the original value of the bit. | |
| ORDERING | |
| -------- | |
| Like with atomic_t, the rule of thumb is: | |
| - non-RMW operations are unordered; | |
| - RMW operations that have no return value are unordered; | |
| - RMW operations that have a return value are fully ordered. | |
| - RMW operations that are conditional are fully ordered. | |
| Except for a successful test_and_set_bit_lock() which has ACQUIRE semantics, | |
| clear_bit_unlock() which has RELEASE semantics and test_bit_acquire which has | |
| ACQUIRE semantics. | |
| Since a platform only has a single means of achieving atomic operations | |
| the same barriers as for atomic_t are used, see atomic_t.txt. | |