| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 |
| |
| ====================================== |
| Devicetree and Open Firmware Subsystem |
| ====================================== |
| |
| Other Process Documents |
| ----------------------- |
| |
| Please see the documents in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ for information |
| on how to write proper Devicetree bindings and how to submit patches. |
| |
| Patch Review and Handling |
| ------------------------- |
| |
| Patches handled by Devicetree maintainers are processed differently depending |
| on the patch type: |
| |
| 1. Core OF driver code, e.g. drivers/of/: |
| patches are reviewed and applied by DT maintainers. |
| |
| 2. Devicetree bindings: |
| patches are reviewed by DT maintainers, but should be applied by subsystem |
| maintainers except in certain cases. See also *For kernel maintainers* in |
| Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst. |
| |
| 3. DTS and drivers: |
| DT maintainers might provide comments, but review is generally not expected. |
| DTS must pass schema checks (dtbs_check) or at least do not add any |
| new warnings. |
| |
| Patchwork |
| ~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Devicetree maintainers review patches using Patchwork, so the current status of |
| a patch can be checked there. For typical driver submissions, Patchwork |
| receives the entire patch set, but only a few patches are usually Devicetree |
| bindings that are reviewed by DT maintainers. |
| |
| Explanation of Patchwork statuses: |
| |
| - **New**: Not yet processed by the automation toolset. |
| - **Needs ACK**: Waiting for review by DT maintainers. |
| - **Handled Elsewhere**: Non-DT patch; not being reviewed here. |
| - **RFC**: Patch was likely ignored because it was an incomplete RFC. |
| - **Changes Requested**: Patch was reviewed and DT maintainers expect changes. |
| - **Accepted**: Patch was reviewed and applied by DT maintainers to their tree. |
| - **Not Applicable**: Patch was reviewed and is likely in good shape, with a |
| *Reviewed-by* or *Acked-by* tag provided, but DT maintainers expect someone |
| else to apply it. |
| |
| Patch Re-review and Pinging |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Due to the high volume of email traffic, Devicetree maintainers do not read |
| every email they receive and instead rely on Patchwork during the review |
| process. They also often skip patches that have already been reviewed. |
| |
| As a result, maintainers might miss: |
| |
| 1. Questions about already reviewed patches. |
| 2. Pings, for example when a patch has been reviewed by DT maintainers but has |
| not been picked up by subsystem maintainers. |
| |
| Such cases can be addressed by: |
| |
| 1. Pinging DT maintainers on the IRC channel. |
| 2. Dropping the DT maintainer’s *Acked-by* or *Reviewed-by* tag when sending a new |
| version of the patch set, together with an explanation in the patch |
| changelog describing why the tag was removed and what is expected from DT |
| maintainers. |
| |