|  | .. _transhuge: | 
|  |  | 
|  | ============================ | 
|  | Transparent Hugepage Support | 
|  | ============================ | 
|  |  | 
|  | This document describes design principles for Transparent Hugepage (THP) | 
|  | support and its interaction with other parts of the memory management | 
|  | system. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Design principles | 
|  | ================= | 
|  |  | 
|  | - "graceful fallback": mm components which don't have transparent hugepage | 
|  | knowledge fall back to breaking huge pmd mapping into table of ptes and, | 
|  | if necessary, split a transparent hugepage. Therefore these components | 
|  | can continue working on the regular pages or regular pte mappings. | 
|  |  | 
|  | - if a hugepage allocation fails because of memory fragmentation, | 
|  | regular pages should be gracefully allocated instead and mixed in | 
|  | the same vma without any failure or significant delay and without | 
|  | userland noticing | 
|  |  | 
|  | - if some task quits and more hugepages become available (either | 
|  | immediately in the buddy or through the VM), guest physical memory | 
|  | backed by regular pages should be relocated on hugepages | 
|  | automatically (with khugepaged) | 
|  |  | 
|  | - it doesn't require memory reservation and in turn it uses hugepages | 
|  | whenever possible (the only possible reservation here is kernelcore= | 
|  | to avoid unmovable pages to fragment all the memory but such a tweak | 
|  | is not specific to transparent hugepage support and it's a generic | 
|  | feature that applies to all dynamic high order allocations in the | 
|  | kernel) | 
|  |  | 
|  | get_user_pages and follow_page | 
|  | ============================== | 
|  |  | 
|  | get_user_pages and follow_page if run on a hugepage, will return the | 
|  | head or tail pages as usual (exactly as they would do on | 
|  | hugetlbfs). Most GUP users will only care about the actual physical | 
|  | address of the page and its temporary pinning to release after the I/O | 
|  | is complete, so they won't ever notice the fact the page is huge. But | 
|  | if any driver is going to mangle over the page structure of the tail | 
|  | page (like for checking page->mapping or other bits that are relevant | 
|  | for the head page and not the tail page), it should be updated to jump | 
|  | to check head page instead. Taking a reference on any head/tail page would | 
|  | prevent the page from being split by anyone. | 
|  |  | 
|  | .. note:: | 
|  | these aren't new constraints to the GUP API, and they match the | 
|  | same constraints that apply to hugetlbfs too, so any driver capable | 
|  | of handling GUP on hugetlbfs will also work fine on transparent | 
|  | hugepage backed mappings. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Graceful fallback | 
|  | ================= | 
|  |  | 
|  | Code walking pagetables but unaware about huge pmds can simply call | 
|  | split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, addr) where the pmd is the one returned by | 
|  | pmd_offset. It's trivial to make the code transparent hugepage aware | 
|  | by just grepping for "pmd_offset" and adding split_huge_pmd where | 
|  | missing after pmd_offset returns the pmd. Thanks to the graceful | 
|  | fallback design, with a one liner change, you can avoid to write | 
|  | hundreds if not thousands of lines of complex code to make your code | 
|  | hugepage aware. | 
|  |  | 
|  | If you're not walking pagetables but you run into a physical hugepage | 
|  | that you can't handle natively in your code, you can split it by | 
|  | calling split_huge_page(page). This is what the Linux VM does before | 
|  | it tries to swapout the hugepage for example. split_huge_page() can fail | 
|  | if the page is pinned and you must handle this correctly. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Example to make mremap.c transparent hugepage aware with a one liner | 
|  | change:: | 
|  |  | 
|  | diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c | 
|  | --- a/mm/mremap.c | 
|  | +++ b/mm/mremap.c | 
|  | @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static pmd_t *get_old_pmd(struct mm_stru | 
|  | return NULL; | 
|  |  | 
|  | pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr); | 
|  | +	split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, addr); | 
|  | if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd)) | 
|  | return NULL; | 
|  |  | 
|  | Locking in hugepage aware code | 
|  | ============================== | 
|  |  | 
|  | We want as much code as possible hugepage aware, as calling | 
|  | split_huge_page() or split_huge_pmd() has a cost. | 
|  |  | 
|  | To make pagetable walks huge pmd aware, all you need to do is to call | 
|  | pmd_trans_huge() on the pmd returned by pmd_offset. You must hold the | 
|  | mmap_lock in read (or write) mode to be sure a huge pmd cannot be | 
|  | created from under you by khugepaged (khugepaged collapse_huge_page | 
|  | takes the mmap_lock in write mode in addition to the anon_vma lock). If | 
|  | pmd_trans_huge returns false, you just fallback in the old code | 
|  | paths. If instead pmd_trans_huge returns true, you have to take the | 
|  | page table lock (pmd_lock()) and re-run pmd_trans_huge. Taking the | 
|  | page table lock will prevent the huge pmd being converted into a | 
|  | regular pmd from under you (split_huge_pmd can run in parallel to the | 
|  | pagetable walk). If the second pmd_trans_huge returns false, you | 
|  | should just drop the page table lock and fallback to the old code as | 
|  | before. Otherwise, you can proceed to process the huge pmd and the | 
|  | hugepage natively. Once finished, you can drop the page table lock. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Refcounts and transparent huge pages | 
|  | ==================================== | 
|  |  | 
|  | Refcounting on THP is mostly consistent with refcounting on other compound | 
|  | pages: | 
|  |  | 
|  | - get_page()/put_page() and GUP operate on head page's ->_refcount. | 
|  |  | 
|  | - ->_refcount in tail pages is always zero: get_page_unless_zero() never | 
|  | succeeds on tail pages. | 
|  |  | 
|  | - map/unmap of the pages with PTE entry increment/decrement ->_mapcount | 
|  | on relevant sub-page of the compound page. | 
|  |  | 
|  | - map/unmap of the whole compound page is accounted for in compound_mapcount | 
|  | (stored in first tail page). For file huge pages, we also increment | 
|  | ->_mapcount of all sub-pages in order to have race-free detection of | 
|  | last unmap of subpages. | 
|  |  | 
|  | PageDoubleMap() indicates that the page is *possibly* mapped with PTEs. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For anonymous pages, PageDoubleMap() also indicates ->_mapcount in all | 
|  | subpages is offset up by one. This additional reference is required to | 
|  | get race-free detection of unmap of subpages when we have them mapped with | 
|  | both PMDs and PTEs. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This optimization is required to lower the overhead of per-subpage mapcount | 
|  | tracking. The alternative is to alter ->_mapcount in all subpages on each | 
|  | map/unmap of the whole compound page. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For anonymous pages, we set PG_double_map when a PMD of the page is split | 
|  | for the first time, but still have a PMD mapping. The additional references | 
|  | go away with the last compound_mapcount. | 
|  |  | 
|  | File pages get PG_double_map set on the first map of the page with PTE and | 
|  | goes away when the page gets evicted from the page cache. | 
|  |  | 
|  | split_huge_page internally has to distribute the refcounts in the head | 
|  | page to the tail pages before clearing all PG_head/tail bits from the page | 
|  | structures. It can be done easily for refcounts taken by page table | 
|  | entries, but we don't have enough information on how to distribute any | 
|  | additional pins (i.e. from get_user_pages). split_huge_page() fails any | 
|  | requests to split pinned huge pages: it expects page count to be equal to | 
|  | the sum of mapcount of all sub-pages plus one (split_huge_page caller must | 
|  | have a reference to the head page). | 
|  |  | 
|  | split_huge_page uses migration entries to stabilize page->_refcount and | 
|  | page->_mapcount of anonymous pages. File pages just get unmapped. | 
|  |  | 
|  | We are safe against physical memory scanners too: the only legitimate way | 
|  | a scanner can get a reference to a page is get_page_unless_zero(). | 
|  |  | 
|  | All tail pages have zero ->_refcount until atomic_add(). This prevents the | 
|  | scanner from getting a reference to the tail page up to that point. After the | 
|  | atomic_add() we don't care about the ->_refcount value. We already know how | 
|  | many references should be uncharged from the head page. | 
|  |  | 
|  | For head page get_page_unless_zero() will succeed and we don't mind. It's | 
|  | clear where references should go after split: it will stay on the head page. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Note that split_huge_pmd() doesn't have any limitations on refcounting: | 
|  | pmd can be split at any point and never fails. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Partial unmap and deferred_split_huge_page() | 
|  | ============================================ | 
|  |  | 
|  | Unmapping part of THP (with munmap() or other way) is not going to free | 
|  | memory immediately. Instead, we detect that a subpage of THP is not in use | 
|  | in page_remove_rmap() and queue the THP for splitting if memory pressure | 
|  | comes. Splitting will free up unused subpages. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Splitting the page right away is not an option due to locking context in | 
|  | the place where we can detect partial unmap. It also might be | 
|  | counterproductive since in many cases partial unmap happens during exit(2) if | 
|  | a THP crosses a VMA boundary. | 
|  |  | 
|  | The function deferred_split_huge_page() is used to queue a page for splitting. | 
|  | The splitting itself will happen when we get memory pressure via shrinker | 
|  | interface. |